Our Moral Imperative
This procedure provides an appropriate template for citizens of any nation to use when filing reports for war crimes indictments.
This is the most promising and empowering public initiative thus far and was filed in Stockholm, not The Hague.
As stated on their website,
“Was your country also part of NATO’s war against Libya in 2011? If so, filing criminal charges for war crimes has never been easier. Just download the template found here, fill in the blanks and send it to the police or relevant prosecuting authority in your country. When you do this, please let us know and we will be happy to include information about the report on this site.”
As my contact with this project described their rationale,
“War crimes are not committed by legal entities – they are committed by humans working within (and hiding behind) legal entities (like international organizations and government burocracies).
The reason we chose to file our report on a national level is our belief that this approach (to have Swedish war criminals tried in the Swedish legal system, for example) will strengthen Sweden – which for some time now has lost more and more influence over it’s own affairs to the globalization process.
We would like to see the same strengthening of national sovereignty happen in all countries.
Even if the ICC were not corrupt, handing individuals over from a country to be tried there means countries giving away their sovereignty to someone else.”
Therefore this project is not only a way for anyone to file reports against their representatives, it is the beginning of the removal of authority from the ICC. For this reason, the importance of this initiative cannot be understated.
I took precautionary action and saved the following document because President Obama ordered the United Nations to delete it.
LIBYA 360° website was established to document crimes for use in future prosecutions.
Critical to note is that the United Nations is not permitted to interfere with peace negotiations, to approve “no fly zones” during such negotiations, or to ignore requests for a fair hearing. Libya was in the process of sincere peace negotiations with both the ALBA nations and the AU when NATO bombardments began.
Libya was excluded from the UN when UNSC Res 1973 was approved.
Libya had a legitimate right to defend its sovereign territory and civilians from hostile invasion. This is enshrined in International law and not one of Libya’s defensive actions was a crime.
When the Libyan military declared a ceasefire, the UN refused to enforce it and the NATO backed militias continually breached each ceasefire, which is another violation of International law.
At every turn, Libya acted in accordance with International law and even honored treaties it had never signed.
This must be emphasized to highlight the crimes of the UN and their NATO-NTC co-conspirators.
It is not possible that any elected official in NATO nations were unaware that what they were doing was illegal and criminal.
Finally, targeted assassinations of tribal leaders, civilians who rejected the NTC, former Libyan government officials and the Gaddafi family are a violation of every law and an affront to our humanity.
Editor of Libya 360°
THE GOVERNMENT, PARLIAMENT AND MILITARY FORCES OF SWEDEN REPORTED FOR WAR CRIMES IN LIBYA
The International Prosecution Chamber in Stockholm
107 22 Stockholm
Report on serious offences subject to public prosecution
Until March 2011 Libya was a sovereign secular state, ranked by the United Nations as a “High Human Development” country in a global context5 (HDI ranking 53 out 194, ahead of countries like Russia and Brazil) and the most advanced country on the continent of Africa.6 As late as Jan 4, 2011 – just weeks before the war started – several UN members applauded Libya’s continued commitment to upholding human rights.7
Today, seven months later, Libya has – as a result of decisions and actions by individuals i.a. within the Swedish government and Sweden’s military forces – been turned into a bombed out war zone with up to a million refugees8 under the control of a “National Transitional Council” (NTC) which is in the process of turning Libya into a theocracy regulated by Islamic Sharia law.9
The leadership and cadre of the NTC rebels are dominated by past and present members10 of designated terrorist organizations11 such as Al-Qaeda (AQ, AQI, AQIM)12 and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).13
The council is presently headed by a de facto triumvirate – holding executive/financial/military power:
- Mahmoud Jibril – a university lecturer educated, and for several years resident, in the US and whose studies was mentored by a renowned CIA case officer working for CIA in Iran during the CIA/staged coup there in 1953.14
- An American economics professor by the name of Ali Tarhouni.15
- A senior Al-Qaeda asset/educator/leader previously operating in Afghanistan and Iraq but who currently acts under the name of Bel Hadj as the Commander in Chief for the NTC as well as military dictator of Tripoli.16
On March 19, 2011, two days after the adoption of UN resolution 1973, this NTC/Al-Qaeda/LIFG rebel council announced the creation of a new central bank and a new oil company.17 Starting a “revolution” with the creation of new central bank may be a possible “first” in world history and casts the long shadow of as yet unidentified international financial actors over the war against Libya.18
The pretext and framework for the attack on Libya by Sweden and other countries was United Nations resolution 1973. This resolution i.a. authorized a ban on flights and measures “to protect civilians and civilian populated areas” whilst excluding “a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory”.19
The reality is that participants in the NATO-led war already at the outset was in violation of resolution 1973 and that the motive was not to protect civilians – but regime-change.
Testimony by former NATO military commander General Wesley Clarke confirms that as early as 2001, Pentagon was instructed to prepare for war against Libya20 – i.e. long before Libya was reported as a “problem” somehow in need of a “solution”.
Thus, the backdrop carries distinct echoes of colonialism,21 spiced with the general geostrategical redrawing of the entire Middle-East set in motion by the attacks in the US on September 11, 200122 and envisaged by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC).23
The event that is said to have triggered NATO’s attack on Libya was the Libyan government’s own attempts to restore order and protect civilians in the Benghazi area, where an estimated one thousand jihadists24 (Al-Qaeda/LIFG) had stormed military storage facilities, and armed themselves and started to shoot up the neighbourhood.
Given the miniscule size and poor to non-existent training of this “rebel” contingent,25 the successful containment and disarmament of these rebels by the Libyan government should have been a foregone conclusion – had it not been for the intervention of French and subsequently US airpower on the side of these Al-Qaeda jihadists.26
Since March 31, 2011, NATO has conducted 9658 air strike sorties,27 averaging 46-47 strike missions per day for 207 days. When assessing the gravity of the war crimes reported here this massive air campaign needs to be contrasted against the realities on the ground.
What are these realities?
Even before UN resolution 1973 Libya was reported to have no effective air force.28 Moreover, and in regional terms, Libya did not have much of a military to speak of in the first place.
For example, indicated by the chart below is that whereas neighbouring countries in the first decade of the 21st century escalated their military expenditures – Libya did the opposite.29
In fact, Libya under Qaddafi, was a remarkably constructive factor in the region – being the founding father of the African Union.30
Reported war casualties vary widely.31 What is clear is that the involvement of the armed forces of Sweden and other countries not only changed the outcome of what would have been the orderly neutralization of a local fringe Al-Qaeda/LIFG flurry into a full-scale regime-change (for the worse) with a death toll, injured and refugees at a very different order of magnitude.
- The attack on Tripoli: There are reports that the NTC/Al-Qaeda/LIFG ground assault on Tripoli July 20, 2011, was amphibious (supported by NATO ships) and planned , directed and led by NATO-officers, also on the ground.32 The way in which the reportedly NATO-led rebels were at all able to progress through Tripoli was by NATO Apache attack helicopters strafing the streets to clear it of civilians.33
- The attack on Sirte:34 Coordinated with NATO’s massive bombing campaign against the city were the rebels cordoning off, of it – preventing civilians attempting to escape the carnage from leaving.
Why would the Swedish government, or any other government, for that matter, wish to prevent civilians from escaping an event that by observers have been likened with the town of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War?35
The level of popular support enjoyed by the Qaddafi government, as reflected by the resistance of the inhabitants of i.a. Tripoli and Sirte, indicates that the Libyan people in vast numbers view the Qaddafi government as the only legitimate government.36
- Genocide on black Libyans:37 Numerous reports exists on the apparent rascist agenda of the NTC/Al-Qaeda/LIFG rebel as they seek out and kill black people.38 Substantiated, as these reports are, the instigators of this as a generic policy in the war may not necessarily have been Al-Qaeda or the LIFG.
- The role of NATO’s so-called Special Forces (SF) units: There also exists high-profile testimonies of how Danish and French SF-units engaged in and set up a policy of publicly decapitating black libyans in order to terrorize the civilian population of Tripoli into submission39 under the capital’s newly installed military dictator Bel Hadj.
- The destruction of the Great Man-Made River project:40 NATO’s wholesale destruction of Lybia’s world-renowned Great Man-Made River project is a text-book example of crimes against international law. Not only did NATO destroy the world’s most advanced water project – it also destroyed the factories capable of repairing this vital civilian infrastructure.
- Use of inhumane weapons such as depleted uranium41 and cluster bombs:42 Evidence points to the possibility of both cluster bombs and depleted uranium being used by NATO in Libya.
- The foreign occupation force prohibited by UN resolution 1973 is in fact what the NATO-led war is all about, both tactically – with military ground force elements – and strategically – with the installation of a puppet terrorist-designated regime controlled by Anglo-American interests.
As a result of initiatives taken by members in the Swedish government, made possible by individuals in the Swedish parliament, and carried out by individuals in the Swedish military, the state of Sweden today shares responsibility for the transformation of the most humanitarian and successful state on the African continent into a third-world war zone run by a conglomerate of terrorist-designated rebels over which the agendas of Anglo-American intelligence and banking oligarchs cast their long shadow.
For more details on casualties, the destruction of civilian life, and civilian infrastructure brought by the military forces of Sweden and other countries, consider the Libya reports from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.43
Given existing international agreements and the clear violations committed by the participants of NATO’s Unified Protector campaign, of the intent and boundaries set by UN Resolution 1973, it is evident that crimes falling i.a. under the following categories have been and are being committed:
- War of aggression
- Crimes against humanity
These crimes were not the result of mission-drift or mission-swings – but were pre-mediated for the purpose of imposing regime-change in Libya in violation of international law.
Given the international consensus of the designation of i.a. Al-Qaeda and LIFG as “terrorists” it is also evident that the following crimes have been and are being committed by the individuals reported here:
- Failure to report on Terrorism
- Support of Terrorism
- Financing of Terrorism
Dates and Periods:
- March 29, 2011 Cabinet Meeting44
- March 30, 2011 Start of Sweden’s military operation FL0145
- April 1, 2011 Parliament vote46
- June 9, 2011 Cabinet Meeting47
- June 17, 2011 Parliament vote48
- July 1, 2011 Start of Sweden’s military operation FL0249
- September 15, 2011 Cabinet Meeting50
- September 21, 2011 Parliament vote51
These MPs listed below voted in favor of the war at event 3 and later abstained:
Brink, Josefin *
Dinamarca, Rossana *
Linde, Hans *
Sjöstedt, Jonas *
Lillemets, Annika *
Interviews with Brink, Dinamarca, Linde, Sjöstedt, and Lillemets (marked with * above) confirm that the reason for abstaining was the realization that the Swedish government was in violation of UN resolution 1973 in its participation of the NATO-led war.52
Key suspects in the Swedish military:
Reported individuals from Sweden’s military establishment include the chain of command from Commander-in-chief Sverker Göransson down to all personnel part of the FL01/FL02/infoop operations . This also includes any staff-members in Sweden involved in the planning, directing and execution of these operations, as well as possibly members of units such as Special Operations Group (SOG) and the parachute regiment at K3 and which may have been involved in the clandestine parts of the war against Libya in 2011 – including the atrocities reportedly committed by French and Danish SF units.
- United Nations resolution 1973
- United Nation’s Human Development Report 2010
- Background paper: “How Al Qaeda men came to power in Libya”, Thierry Meyssan, Sep 7, 2011
- West Point study: “Al-Qaida’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq” Dec 19, 2007
- Government Proposal: 2010/11:117 March 29, 2011
- Government Proposal: 2010/11:127 June 9, 2011
- Government Proposal: 2011/12:5 September 15, 2011
- Video depicting use of cluster bombs by aircrafts
- NTC Draft Constitutional Charter
- “Libya’s Lessons”, Ben Barry, Survival, vol. 53, issue 5. Summary of the war from a western perspective.
- Testimony former NATO Chief General Wesley Clarke March 2, 2007
- Testimony Lizzie Phelan, Oct 4, 2011
- Walter Fauntroy article, Sep 7, 2011
- The Sirte Declaration 1999.
- Rebuilding Americas Defenses, Project for a New American Century, 2000.
|Kristoffer Hell||Peter Pettersson|
|Yrsa Häggström||Leif Erlingsson|